Article / 18 March 2016 at 11:00 GMT

What Germany doesn't want from the LSE merger

  • Merger of Deutsche Börse and LSE will create the globe's largest stock exchange
  • Shareholders of Deutsche Börse will hold the majority
  • Cost savings are estimated at almost EUR500 million/year
  • Germany fears losing out
  • Brexit fear could legislate against locating the HQ in London 
 When it comes to skyline, London... Photo: iStock

By Clemens Bomsdorf

It's not just the influence of German politicians (read: Angela Merkel) that is weakening within Europe. Germany's financial centre (read: Frankfurt) also risks losing power. At least that is the hushed chatter doing the rounds in  Germany's corridors of power 

They fear that the planned merger between the local stock exchange (see here for our MustRead on this), Deutsche Börse, and its UK counterpart, the LSE, has the potential to weaken Frankfurt and hence Germany as a financial hotspot. Just last week, Friedrich von Metzler underlined that he would like to see a pan-European exchange located in Germany, not the UK. Metzler used to be the head of the board Deutsche Börse and is one of the leading owners of his family’s Frankfurt- based private bank Metzler.

No sellout

Deutsche Börse CEO Carsten Kengeter will have to allay the concerns of Metzler and keep shareholders onside a €450 million/year cost-saving platter to “convince the German establishment that shifting the power base of a combined group from Frankfurt to London is not a sellout of Germany’s financial centre. That means taking politicians, influential unions and worker representatives with him,” as the Financial Times’ Financial Editor Patrick Jenkins puts it.

Jenkins does not seem to agree that Frankfurt’s role is at risk, but he is running against quite a powerful consensus in Germany with even those who generally favour mergers and internationally integrated companies and markets raising concerns.

The argument really centres over whether Jenkins is right or if the naysayers are better armed.

 ...and Frankfurt do not differ that much. Photo: iStock

Frankfurt has of course taken a hammering from Deutsche Bank's recent travails and would not want to weaken further.

The rare appearance of an exclamation mark in the headline of Germany’s leading conservative daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung — “Keine Außenstelle Londons!” — says it all: “We are afraid of Frankfurt becoming only an outpost of the London Stock Exchange and we urge everybody who has the power to stop this being so!” That more or less is a longer version in English of the FAZ headline, widely read by business leaders and policymakers.

LSE may have the run on its German counterpart in terms of confidence, but Deutsche Börse is the more important one, not least because it also runs Europe’s largest futures exchange, FAZ argues.

Daniel Mohr, who wrote the commentary, is in favour of the merger, but would prefer the headquarters remain in Frankfurt, where the European Central Bank is located. But if it has to move, why not choose Amsterdam, which is exactly in between the two financial capitals and already is a hub for holdings, he argues.

For the merged group, there is one strong argument in favour of locating the holding in London. Employees would not automatically be guaranteed the right to be represented on the board if the corporation were to be registered in London and German companies have actually benefitted from this model. 

German authorities may also have a role to play as they have to give the merger the green light and may point towards Deutsche Börse's size relative to LSE as reason for keeping the HQ "at home".

There is still one unknown and important factor: the potential Brexit. If the UK leaves the European Union, which many business leaders really do not want, a merged stock exchange with a HQ in London would suddenly be on the periphery.

That might harm all market participants, not only Frankfurt and Germany. Little wonder then that Metzler cites Brexit as an argument in favour of Frankfurt. 

 Does it really matter where an exchange has its HQ? Photo: iStock

The Daily Mail, less well known for in-depth coverage of the markets than the FT, today has a story arguing the merger, seen as a take-over, should be stopped. Read it here if you have time on your hands.

— Edited by Martin O'Rourke

Clemens Bomsdorf is a consulting editor on


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on or as a result of the use of the Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail