Article / 10 March 2014 at 11:14 GMT

Trend following for small portfolios, part 2

Chief Investment Officer / ACIES Asset Management
Switzerland

• Never trust the name of an ETF
• Understand the details fully
• Adopt a clear and simple approach

Last week, I mentioned some of the problems with applying standard trend following on smaller accounts. The big problem is that futures contracts are large, which makes it difficult to put on enough positions to gain sufficient diversification. This week, I'll be talking about exchange traded funds (ETFs).

The original idea of ETFs is great but that doesn't mean that all ETFs are great. If you trade ETFs you need to be really sure of what the fund is doing. Never trust the name of an ETF. 

The original ETFs were passive index investments, in which a computer program would invest the funds' assets to match the exact weights of an index. As between 80 to 90 percent of all mutual funds fail to return the same or more than their benchmark index (according to the SPIVA reports), these passive ETFs are clearly a rational alternative. With such instruments, you'll get the exact return of the index minus a minimum fee, which is a fraction of what the underperforming mutual funds charge.

The only problem is that the ETF industry has developed into a method to sell structured products to people who don't know what structured products are. By packaging structured products in an ETF wrapper and putting a simplified name on it, they are marketed to the unsuspecting retail audience. This, however, is not the topic of this particular article. What you need to know is that you should never trade an ETF that you don't fully understand the details of.

In general, stay away from leveraged ETFs, from short ETFs, from active ETFs and from synthetic ETFs. Go with straight up physically backed ETFs, with a clear, simple and well-described investment approach. 

There are ETFs in many asset classes, covering equities, currencies, rates and commodities. The coverage is not as good as it is for futures but it's reasonable. For diversified trend followers, ETFs have potential but the expectations need to be set very differently than it does for futures traders. Apart from the more limited coverage, the big concern here is the cash utilisation. While futures traders need only pay a small amount in margin upfront, ETFs are cash instruments. 

In this first test, I used 25 ETFs with broad asset class coverage, and applied a standard trend following futures model. The model trades long and short, entering into any emerging trend and puts a trailing stop behind. There has been no optimisations or changes to this default trend model. Nothing has been done to try to improve it for ETF use.

Simulated trend following returns - Diversified ETF portfolio

ETF Sim 1
Source: Original research, simulation done in RightEdge

This shows that we can get a fairly good return profile for a long-term strategy. The gains compared to the drawdowns show a prudent, risk-averse strategy. Whereas the S&P 500 index, showing in blue, took quite a beating in 2008, our strategy kept on going. Of course, it also shows that we failed to achieve the kind of spectacular returns that futures trend following show over time. Even in 2008, which was a stellar year for trend following, we didn't show anything amazing.

The reason for this is the cash utilisation. Without the built in leverage of futures, it's not easy to get enough returns. Remember that for these kinds of strategies, we are taking on equal risk per position. That, of course, means that positions in low volatility instruments are much larger than those of the volatile ones. If a market tends to move by half a percent per day on average, you need to take on a larger position than for one that moves by two percent per day. 

In the futures world this is not a big concern but with limited cash this can become a problem. The low volatility markets will quickly eat up all your cash reserves, leaving nothing for the rest. Running out of cash also introduces a random element into the systematic strategy. Your portfolio will be filled up with the first markets that give a signal, and ignoring the ones after. 

Low volatility instruments can therefore be a problem for cash instrument strategies. The instruments with the smallest daily moves are the rates. Taking them away from the universe reduces diversification but increases profitability. You increase expected return, but also risk.

While ETFs are not optimal for diversified trend following, they can certainly be used. There are a few things we can do to squeeze out a little bit more return.

In the new simulation below, I've made a couple of basic adjustments. The model itself is the same except that I turned off short positions. Having short positions in makes for a smoother return profile over time but in this case it eats up cash without yielding much return. I also removed the rates markets all together, which is bad for diversification but makes more room for the higher volatility markets.

Now we end up with a strategy with decent long-term performance, and clearly beating the index. It does have sharper drawdowns at times than the strategy above but that's the cost of doing business here. 

Simulated trend following returns - Long only, no rates

ETF Sim 2
Source: Original research, simulation done in RightEdge

Now we're up to a compounded return of around 10 percent, which is far higher than the global stock markets have managed to produce. And that's without any special adjustments to the trading rules.

Ten percent is not enough? It's a lot more than most people have been able to make over the years. However, it's a fair point and I shall be looking at ways to get the returns higher in another article.

 

Andreas F. Clenow is a hedge fund manager and principal at ACIES Asset Management. He is also the author of the best-selling book Following the Trend (Wiley 2012).

2y
dannyc dannyc
Hi Andreas. Did you ever do a part 3 to look at trend following using CFD's?

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Tradingfloor.com permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Tradingfloor.com and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Tradingfloor.com is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Tradingfloor.com or as a result of the use of the Tradingfloor.com. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through Tradingfloor.com your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. Tradingfloor.com does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail