Video

Playlist

Show less
10:20
Morning Call: Softer dollar boosts commodities, stocks
#SaxoStrats
21 September 2018 at 7:40 GMT
10:35
Morning Call: Markets stabilise as trade tensions ease
#SaxoStrats
20 September 2018 at 8:28 GMT
10:03
Morning Call: Chinese shares surge as trade war rages on
#SaxoStrats
19 September 2018 at 8:36 GMT
8:51
Today’s FX chart analysis - video
John J Hardy
18 September 2018 at 10:28 GMT
9:42
Morning Call: Trump hits China with tariff plan
#SaxoStrats
18 September 2018 at 7:29 GMT
2:45
The week ahead in macro
Kay Van-Petersen
17 September 2018 at 8:11 GMT
27:58
Macro Monday week 38: Keep Global Macro and Carry On
Kay Van-Petersen
17 September 2018 at 8:02 GMT
10:00
Morning Call: US yield curve lifts, boosting dollar
#SaxoStrats
17 September 2018 at 7:23 GMT
43:30
Technical analysis webinar – A view of the market: Larsson
Kim Cramer Larsson
12 September 2018 at 14:44 GMT
11:15
Morning Call: Chinese shares fall further
#SaxoStrats
11 September 2018 at 8:36 GMT
11:34
Morning Call: USD, SEK in focus
#SaxoStrats
10 September 2018 at 7:49 GMT
2:47
The week ahead in macro
Kay Van-Petersen
10 September 2018 at 7:37 GMT
14:02
Morning Call: Is Japan next?
#SaxoStrats
07 September 2018 at 7:35 GMT
Video / 04 July 2017 at 10:00 GMT

Quarterly Outlook: Tapping the brakes — #SaxoStrats

Steen Jakobsen
   • Credit being withdrawn from global markets
   • Process necessary, but recession a risk
   • 'We see lower inflation and think the hike cycle is about to end'

Credit impulse
 
By Steen Jakobsen

Is close to 10 years of monetary policy experimentation finally coming to an end? The financial media sure seem to think so, while the Federal Reserve is striding determinedly along its hiking path and continues to signal more rather than less tightening to come.

The Bank of Japan, meanwhile, is exploring potential exits from its quantitative easing programme, and the European Central Bank is talking tapering.

At the same time, fixed income rates (and volatility) continue to go down – this is hardly the textbook correlation, so something else must be going on.

Indeed, the basic premise in economic and monetary policy since the low of 2008 has been credit expansion, i.e. increasing the amount of credit to help the economy recover. What was once help, however, has now become an addiction – so much so, in fact, that stopping the flow of credit will lead to a serious hangover.

This is what our report for 2017’s third quarter is all about: tapping the brakes!

Despite all of the hawkish talk circulating, tapping the brakes in terms of credit expansion risks incurring recession-like growth rates by the end of this year, and here’s why:

We economists know next to nothing about the actual black box called “the economy”; instead, we tend to monitor what comes out of the box – profit, productivity, inflation, and jobs, among other things.

The problem with this, however, is that we try to predict the course of the economy by using data points that actually follow those that we predict. To mitigate this, then, we try to look at what really drives an economy: the price of money as well as the amount of credit and energy.

The price of money – the interest rate – is the primary discounting factor that we use. The amount of credit is then used to calculate velocity and business activity, and energy lies in everything you have done today, so it’s a key component and (more importantly) a cost of the economy.

What’s interesting is that despite the currently bullish headlines and high equity valuations, we are at risk of a serious slowdown. When monitoring credit we talk about the “credit impulse,” or the net change in credit divided into the GDP.

The credit impulse leads the real economy by approximately nine months.

Another way to illustrate this is by looking backwards. In 2016, Q1 saw the worst start to a trading year in decades. Central banks panicked, the Fed stopped hiking, the ECB went full throttle on QE, and the Bank of Japan adopted a new 10-year fixed rate – this amounted to a massive positive credit impulse as illustrated above.

Then, in Q3 and Q4, China became focused on tightening and reducing final leverage. So let’s apply the nine month rule to 2016… if we trace a path through May, June, July, September, October, November, December, January, and February, we should see the peak in “activity” following the expansion of credit impulse fall in January/February – and so it did!

No, the surges seen in PMI and inflation were not driven by the electoral victory of Donald Trump (expectation were, though) but instead by a large-scale credit expansion.
Every time that there has been a “bump in the road”, the solution has been the same: more credit. Now, however, central banks are openly challenging this and in the case of both the Fed and the People’s Bank of China they are forcefully reducing the “impulse” – this means that, without new reforms or tax breaks, the US and global economy will slow down significantly by the end of this year.

We have put the odds of this at 60% (not 100% , mind) but the real relevance of this call is the fact that a recession is the only true risk to the present Goldilocks environment of money flowing to stocks based on TINA ( “there is no alternative”, as per Societe Generale's Albert Edwards).

Since the 1920s, the average recession has cost investors 33%, with the range being 25-55% . And recession, of course, is precisely the ultimate risk being courted by the model of credit expansion via a weak US dollar.

Steen Jakobsen
 
This, of course, is also the precise thing that policymakers are trying to avoid by attempting to suspend the business cycle.

This is a not a call for doom and gloom, but a note that if credit is the sole ingredient which has been used to tweak the economy over the last 10 years, then maybe the moment at which the three elements that go into our “black box” – the price of money, credit, and energy – start throwing up sparks is one we should pay attention to.

Right now, the price of policy money is rising (medium- and long-term yields are falling), the credit impulse is negative, and energy is flirting with low of the year (disinflationary).

Central banks are making the classic mistake of looking at trailing economic data, insisting that the slowdown seen in inflation and economic activity is “transitory”. We, however, will stick with the facts and counter that economic “gravity” will prevail – the credit impulse can be ignored, but one does so at one’s own risk… and one’s peril.

We see lower inflation and think the hike cycle is about to end, including the hawkish talk. This we see leading to excess return for fixed income and gold, and some incoming risk to equities.

We do also acknowledge that both consensus and investors think there is ample time to change, but time has a habit of fooling even its best observers, let alone those inflamed by desire…

Afore me! It is so very late,
That we may call it early by and by.”
      ― William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet

— Edited by Michael McKenna

Steen Jakobsen is chief economist and CIO at Saxo Bank

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Tradingfloor.com permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Tradingfloor.com and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Tradingfloor.com is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Tradingfloor.com or as a result of the use of the Tradingfloor.com. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through Tradingfloor.com your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. Tradingfloor.com does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail