Article / 03 May 2017 at 13:30 GMT

Putin needs to accept new rules of the game

Russia oil and gas expert
United Kingdom
  • May 2 phone call between Trump and Putin illuminates dynamics of relationship
  • Notion that Trump wants a compromise with Moscow sounds like wishful thinking
  • Reported plan for face-to-face meeting in late May seems to have failed
  • Man-to-man talks apparently need to wait until G20 summit in Germany in July
  • US plan for Syria would create unofficial safe zones, meaning partitioning
  • Russia's job would be to talk Assad into it or to step back and allow it
  • If there is a Trump-Putin meeting in July, it would be on Western terms
  • For Putin it looks like an international upset
Vladimir Putin
 Russian President Vladimir Putin faces changed rules in the 
geopolitical game. Photo: Shutterstock

By Nadia Kazakova

There are phone conversations and there are phone conversations. The one between President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump on May 2 has been analysed perhaps more than any other phone call, for more reasons than one.

As usual, there are conflicting accounts on who initiated the call. It is important as it shows who is in the driver's seat of the relationship. The Wall Street Journal said Putin asked for the call, the Russian Kommersant Daily said Trump called Putin.

Unlike in his very early days, Trump might now be more versed in the intricacies of international diplomacy – it's an old power game. So it sounds implausible that — as Kommersant Daily put it — “by deciding to call his Russian colleague and to discuss conflict in Syria and situation around North Korea, Donald Trump has demonstrated his willingness to find a compromise with Moscow.” That sounds like wishful thinking on the Russian side.

A week before the call, the same Kommersant Daily ran an exclusive report on the apparent preparations for the first face-to-face meeting between the presidents in late May, when Trump will travel to Europe to the Nato and G7 summits in Belgium and Italy. According to Kommersant, President Trump would “pop out” to a third country to meet President Putin.

If there was an attempt to arrange such a meeting, most likely by the eager Russian side, it must have failed. The man-to-man talks would need to wait, possibly until the G20 summit in Germany in July. Again, Kommersant said that such a meeting was agreed during the May 2 call, while the Wall Street Journal said there was no agreement to meet at that time.

The WSJ's assessment of the situation seems closer to reality. 

After the US missile strike in Syria in early April, the US administration ramped up pressure on Moscow. US secretary of state Rex Tillerson must have delivered the American plan on Syria to Putin on April 12. The first step would be to create unofficial safe zones in Syria.

In other words, it would be a partitioning of Syria, and Russia would have to take responsibility for talking the Assad regime into it or stepping back and letting it happen anyway, without Assad. Either way, it is not a pleasant choice for the Kremlin, as the tables have turned decisively. The US is back with a bang in the region, and there might not be much space left for a meddling and inflexible Russia.

If it is a "take-it-or-leave-it" offer to the Kremlin, then there is nothing really to discuss at one-to-one summits either in May or July. If there is a meeting in July, it would be on Western terms. German chancellor Angela Merkel must have rammed that idea home when she met Putin in Sochi. The meeting would be on her turf, and the big boys and girls of G7 would now set the rules.

For Putin it is just an international upset. Throughout his current term in office, he has built his domestic image on the back of successful conquests abroad. With the economy stagnant, a retreat from Syria or east Ukraine would be politically very painful. While the Russian media might put the desired spin on events for the public, the political and business elite would be much harder to misguide.

They probably care little about either Syria or Ukraine and want a horse-riding winner for their leader, not a junior negotiating partner who has misjudged his hand so badly.

Donald Trump
 The new showman in town. Photo: Shutterstock

— Edited by John Acher

Nadia Kazakova is a specialist on Russia, particularly the oil and gas sector


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on or as a result of the use of the Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail