Video

Kim Cramer Larsson
Areas covered in this webinar by Saxo Bank technical analyst Kim Cramer Larsson include EURUSD, USDJPY, GBPUSD, EURGBP, gold, silver, S&P 500, the Nasdaq, the Dax, the FTSE and the Dow Jones.
Article / 02 April 2015 at 16:21 GMT

Postcards from the Edge: Liquidity, wherefore art thou?

Director / Accumen Management
United Kingdom
By Ken Veksler

The term "market structure" has been increasingly thrown around of late and it makes me wonder what that actually means. What is market structure?
 
I’ve been a participant in the financial markets for just over 20 years and in that time have been on both the buy and sell sides (the usual terms for being a buyer and/or seller of banking services). I’ve sold and I’ve bought not just services but also financial instruments for myself and also on behalf of others. And... after all that time and all those roles I will happily put my hand up and admit I’m not entirely sure what the heck market structure actually is.

In my first job as a strapper on an FX desk, my simple introduction to how markets worked was just this “You’re either a price maker or you’re a price taker” yelled at me by my boss and head of the desk.

That notion is simple and it works.

Of course, beyond that, you’ve got to think who constitutes the overall groups of price takers and makers, what do the intermediaries do (and who are they), where and how do the deals get done etc. Perhaps this is what is meant by the term market structure. All these players in their constituent parts are the very make up and hence structure of the market that we ourselves partake in daily.

The fact that I’ve not given much thought to the idea of market structure until recently perhaps says more about the efficiencies and efficacies of said market than it does about my own lack of idle curiosity. That very simple idiom of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” most certainly applies here. Or it used to. For now, it is my belief, that this market is indeed broken. Or perhaps more to the point, the structure that it has now morphed into and the constituent parts of that very structure are no longer efficient nor effective in achieving its primary mandate.

Yes, I know, I can hear you as I type, you think I’m about to go into a rant about central bankers and how they’re the scourge of the Earth, laying waste to all in their path... Nope, not even close. I mean, naturally, yes, they too are part of this market, but I certainly wouldn’t hold them solely responsible or for that matter even largely so. They are but part of the broader issue. If I were to generalise (and lord knows I’m prone to it) I’d say the problem is liquidity and the lack thereof. Now, citing liquidity is a great catch all for those that don’t understand what it actually represents and how it comes to be in the first place. But it also serves to illustrate the point that without it the market fails to operate properly.

What constitutes liquidity is pretty simple, it’s the presence (uninterrupted) of buyers and sellers at all times and at all prices, meeting, agreeing their respective side of the transaction (price) and ultimately getting the deal done (transacting). If this simple mechanism breaks down or for whatever reason ceases to operate efficiently, then the entire market suffers the repercussions. Liquidity providers come in all shapes and sizes and obviously litter both the buy and sell sides (refer above) of the landscape. Naturally the bigger the participant the greater the propensity and willingness to transact on an uninterrupted basis. So, for instance on the sell side this invariably means tier 1 banks and the like. Your Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Deutsche et al. While conversely on the buy side it means the world’s largest hedge funds, corporate treasuries, pension funds etc.

Looking at the sell side firstly, until recently they’ve been able to operate fairly well, uninterrupted and unhindered. It may of course be argued (likely correctly) that this very operation unencumbered by sufficient oversight is exactly what led us down the rabbit hole of the GFC and into the global new normal as we now know it. In an attempt to right this egregious wrong they have had all manner of new regulation lumped upon them. 

The Basel III rules, Glass-Steagall and perhaps of most relevance finally, Dodd-Frank. It’s the last one that I believe has been the final nail in the coffin. While nowhere near entirely operational as it was originally intended, it has still had largely the required impact which has meant the substantial reduction of risk taking activities by deposit taking institutions.

Let me paint you a simple picture, in days gone by, the head of the FX desk in any one of these banks or chief EUR trader for instance, could walk into the office and fancy buying some. Once he’d bought some (say $30mio+), he could then turn around and buy some more (another $50mio+) and then just for a laugh after morning tea, perhaps he’d buy some more (another $20mio+). So all in, by the time he was ready to go to lunch, he’d be long of $100mio+ in EUR. In the process of having bought all that EUR, he would’ve been the catalyst for other counterparts in other banks to do likewise and then, they as pack leaders, would further be responsible for dragging the rest of the market in its entirety much higher with it. No rhyme, no reason other than the advantage of first mover etc.

Well, no more folks. Not at all. Intraday limits for bank traders have been so drastically cut, that they might as well punt margin FX at their local broker on a personal account, let alone be responsible for trading in such size as to actually swing the market around. I speak of course of those traders that still actually have a job in light of the sackings etc post the recent regulatory probes into price fixing etc. The point is, as liquidity and catalyst providers, that side of the equation is all but dead.

Naturally this is just an example as it relates to FX, but I can assure you a similar picture exists in many other markets and instruments...

On the buy side, it’s a similar yet slightly different story. Using hedge funds (and the larger ones at that) as the generalised protagonist here, the reason they were able to make such consistent outsized returns is because they were each in their own way niche players. Couple this “niche” expertise in certain market segments with the massive size to swing those very markets around and there you have the basic recipe to their success. Yes I know it’s very, very simplified, but that’s how I’m looking at it for now without writing you an entire white paper on how hedge funds make abnormal returns.

Anyway back to my main point, which is that as markets seemingly become more efficient and niches are prone to increased exploitation by new players entering the scene, the advantages that these players had continues to ebb ever so slowly away. So, if they were able to generate returns using a combination of size and niche expertise, then simply put, the niches are becoming increasingly “nichier” and the size they enjoyed throwing about so much, now leaves them as stranded as the proverbial beached whale. Meaning, that as they try and unwind positions in the face of a changing world, they end up doing more harm than good to their own p/l etc. So, as a result, the vast bulk of them are handing money back to investors as the world becomes a harder place for them to operate in etc.

And this too, draws liquidity out of the pool and leaves us with... yeah you guessed it....

My point to all of the above is pretty simple, the market as we now know it is so very vastly different to the market I once knew. It has been irreversibly changed and to such a degree that FX, for example, is now backed into a corner where no good can come from any of this.


Regulators are grinning, participants are shaking their heads and the market remains broken.

Erratic price action on the basis of what seems to be fresh air will not only continue but also actually amplify in its frequency and regularity. Activity as that witnessed in the aftermath of the most recent FOMC meeting which was entirely counterintuitive, or more to the point violently overdone, owes itself to the lack of liquidity and is soon to become par for the course rather than the exception.

Market structure? Yeah, it just ain't what it used to be.

– Edited by Clare MacCarthy

Ken Veksler is director of Accumen Management

4y
benlouro benlouro
agree Ken once again. We just have to wait for the price of Money to go up around the world to see if things start to work again properly... have a good Easter.
4y
goldfinger goldfinger
Interesting piece Ken. I am going back a long way but I worked for a bank whose mantra was that "we provide liquidity, much of the rest takes it". Needless to say they are currently going through the proverbial wringer!

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Tradingfloor.com permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Tradingfloor.com and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Tradingfloor.com is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Tradingfloor.com or as a result of the use of the Tradingfloor.com. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through Tradingfloor.com your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. Tradingfloor.com does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail