Kim Cramer Larsson
Areas covered in this webinar by Saxo Bank technical analyst Kim Cramer Larsson include EURUSD, USDJPY, GBPUSD, EURGBP, gold, silver, S&P 500, the Nasdaq, the Dax, the FTSE and the Dow Jones.
Article / 27 June 2012 at 9:44 GMT

Meeting of EU Cardinals around the corner?

Chief Economist & CIO / Saxo Bank

One of our central premises during this EU debt crisis has been that it will only end when we have a ‘Meeting of the Cardinals’, a meeting of key EU players once the crisis reaches a critical phase that results in a dramatic restructuring of Europe. This is a theme we introduced in our Outrageous Predictions for 2012. The meeting could happen sooner rather than later as Europe is painfully divided into the economic camps of North versus South and the political camps of Club Med versus Merkel.

We are now nearing the point of no return for Europe. Time is running out as higher capital costs for Club Med combined with no lending and capital flight increases the odds of a need for a true crisis summit meeting sooner rather than later. Europe’s internal differences have never been more irreconcilable.

The gang of five (Draghi, Barroso, Monti, Rajoy and Hollande) is trying to force Germany to accept a pooling of debt, but the Hollande plan is always based on others paying. Meanwhile, in France he is merely extending-and-pretending that he can deliver on his socialist agenda without any need for structural reforms.

To illustrate how out of touch the concept of “Germany paying is” let’s look at some some round numbers:

  • Germany’s GDP: EUR 3.2 trillion
  • Deleveraging of European banks over next five years (IMF): EUR 5.0 trillion
  • Balance sheet of banks in Europe: EUR 33.0 trillion, or about 300% of Euro Zone’s GDP
  • ECB Balance sheet: EUR 4.0 trillion

The magnitude of this debt crisis is far larger than the market realises, and in fact it is so big that there is no real solution as imagined by either side of the north/south divide. The idea that it’s merely a question of Germany paying is not only naive, but also impossible. They cannot and they should not. And we can all forget the silly notion that the ECB is the only solution to this debt crisis. There is only one solution: the system must fail and the Euro and the EU needs to be redefined. Let’s be clear that the German plan is nowhere perfect, but it is conceptually the right way. We can’t solve this by taking short-cuts to a banking union when there is no political or fiscal union. The reason Europe is going up in flames economically is the lack of accountability on behalf of policy makers and politicians. Giving them more rope to hang themselves via extend-and-pretend measures is not the path forward.

Over the next few days we will have the inevitable song-and-dance from the EU, and yesterday Van Rompuy leaked his “game changing plan for Europe” to the Financial Times. I think the headline speaks for itself: Van Rompuy scales back Eurozone plan – as per usual it was all talk and no substance. Extend-and-pretend squared.

I note that since my piece: Is Merkel misinterpreted the German government and its officials, including the Bundesbank, have made it absolutely clear to the Club Med that Merkel is in no position to give up on the fiscal compact and strict adherence to the EU Treaty and ECB’s mandate.

Overall the problem is more with Hollande and France than with Germany. Hollande has again and again stated: “There can be no transfer of sovereignty if there is no improvement in solidarity”. Consider that Hollande is running a country with no growth, massive fiscal deficit and the lowest pension age in Europe – the pinnacle of Entitlement Europe. Hollande has managed to change J.F Kennedy’s famous inauguration speech 180 degrees: For France and Club Med the speech now reads: “Ask not what you can do for Europe: ask what Germany can do for you”. As Simon Nixon writes in his WSJ piece: France is the main obstacle to a Euro Solution: “France has always been reluctant to cede sovereignty to the European Union. To create a fiscal and banking union without a political union would multiply the original mistakes in the creation of the monetary union. And there is one country that has historically said “non” to the transfers of sovereignty that put the Eurozone on a long-term stable footing: France

How is France going to “back down” from here if Germany stands firm? France’s self-image is one of power and influence, but the more France relies on help from German friends or the ECB the more likely it is they will lose power. You can’t be a borrower or beneficiary of help and name the conditions. Take your pick, Hollande. Hence even for France the ultimate and best solution is to go the German way. Yes, they will lose face, but they will do so anyway as the Hollande plan is a non-starter and as such bound to fail and will only lead to lower growth and higher unemployment. Maybe someone should point out to Hollande that The Third Way introduced by Bill Clinton and finessed by Tony Blair never really worked?

There are two ways this summit can go down: Either Germany gives up and takes all of Europe with it in a tail-spin of ever lower credit ratings and higher funding costs as the systemic risk for the entire EU climbs higher and higher on the lack of common sense from Germany and the final abandoment of what should have been a cornerstone of the EU - the stability and growth pact. Or: France gives up and Hollande will be the President who forced France to transform its own self-image.

I do not see either France or Germany giving up but remember in the context of Europe we have been here before: After the Delors Committee report in 1989 there was long and extensive negotiation between mainly Kohl and Mitterand on when the Euro should start. Germany wanted everyone to be inside the convergence criteria first, but in the end France won a concession in 1991 that the European Monetary Union would start January 1999 regardless of the degree of convergence. This was a mistake by Germany (and France) as it is the very reason the Club Med is in trouble – they never really qualified. I think Germany remembers this and has learned from it.

We now have a Mexican stand-off. How do we move on from here? I see three possibilities:

  • Meeting of the Cardinals – 40 per cent probability
  • Extend-and-pretend Squared – 40 percent probability
  • Doom-and-Gloom - 20 percent

The Meeting of the Cardinals will be the only orderly solution dictated by rational and practical solutions. Some countries need to leave the EUR, whether permanently or temporarily. Here, the guinea pig will most likely be Greece. This will force Club Med to the table and make the members accept further loss of sovereignty on fiscal and monetary policy, most likely in a German model where the European Court of Justice becomes the highest ranking authority.

The lead-in to the Meeting of the Cardinals (MoC) will be a negative market reaction but it will trigger the final phase of our three phase crisis model (Denial, Protest and Mandate for Change). Inside the mandate for change there is a V-shaped recovery when reforms are initiated from the low point, so for investors, the MoC is the best solution and could lead to several years of prosperity and lead us to the better returns for equities, which right now have been declared dead by most media.

Extend-and-pretend squared. The reason for “squared” is that we have done this for so long that the impact will be more negative and the upside when doing more QE and LTRO will be shorter and less potent, probably even counterproductive. No one in their right mind believes lower interest rates will solve anything. The market clearly knows that to deal with solvency someone needs to take a loss – not get more debt. As governments and the ECB get more desperate in Q3 and Q4 they will initiate more of their unconventional measures, but the impact will fizzle away as quickly as the English dreams of winning the European football championship.

Doom-and-gloom. This is the concept that there are no good solutions to this crisis. We are trained/educated to think there is always a solution to a problem, but we have been doing this for so long and we are out of time. If there is a complete impasse, the only immediate path left will be a “Destruction of Capital” in the good old Joseph Schumpeter sense. The forest fire of deleveraging that cleans the slate. In this scenario, markets will retest their 2009 lows and there will be a deep rooted discontentment with politics and the banking system, which could even lead to social unrest and worse.

I do not see an initially positive outcome for any of the above scenarios. We are primed for a summer of discontent in Europe and even if I am wrong, and Germany caves in, the reaction will be a maximum of 10 percent on the upside before the market realises that this is again merely extending-and-pretending, not the first step towards a better stronger Europe. The investors I talk to whose opinion and insights I value the most feel that:

  • Credit is getting expensive, although it’s still the most tempting asset.
  • EMG pricing is a story of overvaluation and over-projection of a positive bias
  • Stocks – fairly priced, but still with no outlook for improvement in earnings or momentum
  • No end in sight for the EU debt crisis
  • A US fiscal cliff that is growing ever larger
  • China real growth is closer to 5-6% than 7-8%

Basically, there is no value for stocks, bonds or commodities in this environment as there is no appetite. The appetite has been dulled by the inability of policymakers to come up with simple credible solutions rather than non-plans and empty promises. The summer of discontent will be the result and the market could be under pressure all the way into August, at which time Greece may be on the brink together with Spain and Italy as inaction is not an option. The markets are finally calling the policymakers’ bluff – time is ripe for reforms, not more talk.

Safe travels,

Steen Jakobsen



Steen Jakobsen, Saxo Bank’s Chief Economist, writes regularly about the global economic picture for  If you’d like to be notified by email every time Steen writes something new, become a member of – it’s free, and you can sign in using Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn.  You can see Steen’s previous stories on the Steen Jakobsen page

seemore seemore
Very negative point of view ...
I hope not everyone sees this EU debt crisis this way ...
bakrob99 bakrob99
Thanks for your article. It is helpful to put some numbers to it and keep it in perspective.
Massimo Russo Massimo Russo
The scanario is very probabilistic, but I hope that they'll find a positive agreement
Mark Wogan Mark Wogan
I see Steen's analysis as being quite the opposite. It is wholly positive in my view to have appropriate data laid out in a clear and unambiguous manner that clearly shows 'pretend and extend' has no further value in helping to solve this crisis. Germany cannot alone save the Euro or the EU. Only by acting in concert and with an explicit plan for shared sovereignty for fiscal control can the EU resolve the debt issue. I absolutely do hope that everyone (but particularly the Club Med political leaders) would view this crisis in this manner because they might then stop fiddling while Rome burns. Hollande's position is quite preposterous in this whole matter and until he takes France a step further towards Merkels position rather than running in the opposite direction (lowering retirement age!! - it beggers belief), there will be no solution. It is ironic to consider that the fine priciples that gave birth to the EU (closer political union) might be its undoing - and worse.
goldfinger goldfinger
succinctly put mapman, you echo my thoughts completely on Steen's very helpful piece
yburil yburil
very partisan, not up to the level of analysis you've done before...
bakrob99 bakrob99
yburil - Thanks for the laugh. A bit of self promotion?
yburil yburil
just a contrarian analysis... you may well argue that Germany is alone in the whole world refusing QE. And way too much politics above (French ministers etc)


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on or as a result of the use of the Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail