Is the Goldilocks trade back on? While longer-term global growth and macro trends argue otherwise, a dovish FOMC and a dip in 10-year US yields has sentiment on the rise in the short term.
Article / 29 January 2013 at 9:39 GMT

JPY cross consolidation ahead of FOMC event risk

Head of FX Strategy / Saxo Bank

USDJPY backed off the 91.00 level in recognition of tomorrow’s FOMC event risk and as US 10-year yields pulled back after pushing to the 2.00% level yesterday. US Consumer Confidence up later today.

It’s rather interesting that the massive weakening in the JPY has failed to nudge Japan’s small business confidence more than a couple of points from its November levels. This is perhaps because it is the large exporters that stand to gain the most from currency developments, but still... USDJPY failed to maintain the 91.00 level yesterday and overnight despite the move to nudge the 2.00% level in the US 10-yr. yield, the highest level since last April (though bonds firmed in late trading yesterday). It makes sense for the JPY crosses to pull back a tad here from their march higher as we have significant event risks in the pipeline in the from of tomorrow’s FOMC meeting and the US employment report on Friday. That 2.00% level in bonds is an important one for the future of USDJPY, which could yet drift higher if bonds continue to crumblepost-FOMC, while the resistance may get firm up if bonds stage a rally here.

FOMC – new voters, new dovish/hawkish mix
Four of the voting members of the FOMC will change as the various regional Fed presidents are rotated. While the vocal Lacker will be rotated out, he will be replaced with the approximately equally hawkish Bullard of the St. Louis Fed and (according to this post by ZeroHedge from a couple of weeks ago that reprints a helpful overview graphic from SocGen) a slightly hawkish George of the Kansas City Fed. But while this may mean we have a chance at two dissenting votes rather than just one, we also have the return of two ultra-doves, Evans of the Chicago Fed and Rosengren of the Boston Fed. Evans is of the pro-NGDPLT persuasion. The most dovish scenario that some are imagining is one in which Bernanke steps down and makes way for Obama to appoint the very dovish Yellen who could sway the FOMC to nominal GDP level targeting. But that’s not what the futures market is predicting here – if we look out the curve at the likes of late 2014 EuroDollar STIRs, we’re actually seeing the market predicting an earlier tightening than the Fed itself has said it is likely to take. That contract is near a five month low and has come off a solid 14 ticks from recent highs. It will be up to tomorrow’s new FOMC statement to either extend that move or deny it.

All in all, tomorrow’s FOMC meeting is as important as ever for establishing the latest mood from the Fed and this will have a bearing on the US dollar depending on where it lies on the dovish/hawkish scale. In this case, dovish is business as usual with virtually no changes to the statement (or minor changes that downgrade the Fed’s description of some aspect of economic conditions) while hawkish is any mention or hint of a discussion that the concept of Fed tightening is a concept that still exists.

But it is also interesting to note the US dollar’s strength in general of late despite very complacent markets in general and the 1500 level being taken out in the S&P 500. More on this subject in future posts, but the one-sentence version is likely that the US is farther along the curve in the deleveraging process than much of the rest of the world, and therefore there is “more upside” potential for the US economy, or perhaps more likely – “less downside” than elsewhere. Consider an economy like Canada’s or Sweden’s, for example, where the credit bubble is just now maxing out – and where a painful deleveraging cycle eventually awaits.

Later today, I’ll be watching the US Consumer Confidence survey with interest. December’s data saw a sharp drop back into the old range – is confidence tailing off or was this a one-off triggered by all of the uncertainty of the fiscal-cliff talk in the media? The weekly Bloomberg consumer comfort surveys don’t show any improvement since the first of the year – quite the contrary, and let’s remember that the fiscal/policy uncertainty most certainly still weighs.

Stay careful out there.

Economic Data Highlights

  • New Zealand Dec. Trade Balance out at +486M vs. -105M expected and -590M in Nov.
  • Australia Dec. NAB Business Conditions out at -4 vs. -6 in Nov.
  • Australia Dec. NAB Business Confidence out at +3 vs. -9 in Nov.
  • Japan Jan. Small Business Confidence out at 44.3 vs. 43.8 in Dec.
  • Germany Feb. GfK Consumer Confidence out at 5.8 vs. 5.7 expected and 5.6 in Jan.
  • Spain Dec. Adjusted Retail Sales out at -10.7% YoY vs. -8.9% expected and -7.8% in Nov.

Upcoming Economic Calendar Highlights (all times GMT)

  • US Nov. S&P/CaseShiller Home Price Index (1400)
  • US Jan. Consumer Confidence (1500)
  • US Weekly API Crude Oil and Product Inventories (2130)
  • New Zealand Dec. Building Permits (2145)
  • Japan Dec. Retail Trade (2350)


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on or as a result of the use of the Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer
- 沪ICP备13028953号-1

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail