Article / 24 April 2017 at 10:28 GMT

Forget Twitter! Russia signals Ukraine shift via Bloomberg

Russia oil and gas expert
United Kingdom
  • Kremlin quietly tightening links with the breakaway territories, Bloomberg reported
  • Putin's spokesman promptly called the Bloomberg story naïve and primitive
  • But the story was likely meant to signal Russia's intentions and test the reaction
  • Newly declared Russian policy would cement status quo in the region
  • Russian move to take de-facto control follows slow demise of Minsk accord
  • Latest ceasefire attempt has come to nothing
  • Deterioration of the situation would only add to already mounting political risks
  • New Russian policy means higher risks for markets, including risk of extra sanctions

Ukraine and Russia flags on dry wall
  Newly declared Russian policy would cement the status 
quo in the region. Image: Shutterstock

By Nadia Kazakova

US president Donald Trump communicates with the world via Twitter. Russia's Vladimir Putin might have found a more subtle and business-friendly route. He seems to conduct his foreign policy via Bloomberg.

Last September, the world learnt about Russia's desire to join Opec's output cuts in a Bloomberg interview. Last week, Bloomberg ran a story on Russia's new policy in the east of Ukraine. The Kremlin is quietly tightening links with the breakaway territories. 

While Putin's administration continues to pay lip service to the Minsk accord (wider autonomy to so-called Luhansk and Donetsk people's republics within Ukraine), in reality the Kremlin wants Donbass region fully separated from Ukraine, according to Bloomberg sources. There are no plans to annex the region, though. 

President Putin's spokesman has duly called the Bloomberg story naïve and primitive.

The Bloomberg article probably stated the obvious for those who have been following the situation in the east of Ukraine (but fewer in the financial markets pay attention). But the news story was likely meant to send a signal about Russia's intentions and to test the reaction.

The newly declared Russian policy would cement the status quo in the region. Since their emergence in April 2014, the separatist republics would not have existed without Russian support. In early 2017, Putin signed a decree officially recognising passports issued by break-away republics. It would allow over three million of their citizens, for example, to open accounts with Russian banks. 

In late February 2017, the head of the Donetsk people's republic proclaimed that the contact line with the Ukrainian armed forces would become the official border with Ukraine. In March 2017, large Ukrainian companies have been confiscated by separatists' governments following an economic blockade by Ukraine. 

The Russian decision to take de-facto full economic and political control over the separatist regions followed the slow and largely unnoticed demise of the Minsk accord. The breaking point has been Russia insisting on wide autonomy for the separatist regions as a pre-condition for any further steps and a comprehensive ceasefire, while the Ukrainian government had no desire or popular mandate for such a move. 

By early March this year, the Minsk accord all but disintegrated. The contact group continues to meet, but its latest attempt of a ceasefire (from April 1) has come to nothing. Over the past weekend, the Ukrainian press reported extensive gun fire along the separation line and a soldier killed on the Ukrainian side. 

On April 23, an Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe patrol car drove into a mine in the rebel-held Luhansk region. A US citizen, one of the unarmed special observer mission, was killed, two others were injured. The incident caused a flurry of diplomatic activity, including a US State Department statement calling for Moscow to use its influence on “Russia-led separatist forces” to implement the Minsk agreement and allow the OSCE to conduct a full investigation into the explosion.


Sealing off the Donbass region — if that is the new Russian policy — would have further consequences. For the Putin administration, it closes the door on the political settlement in the east Ukraine and, effectively, takes that issue off the geopolitical negotiating table. On the one hand, it gives Moscow more flexibility elsewhere, including in the Middle East. On the other hand, the Donbass region becomes a full financial burden and political responsibility.  

Any deterioration of the situation in the region (flare-up along the border, political unrest, incidents similar to the one on April 23) would only add to the already mounting internal and external political risks for the current administration. 

For the financial markets the new Russian policy would mean higher risks. Risk of extra sanctions (either on Syria or east Ukraine), risk of a higher budget deficit as subsidies and military expenses mount, risk of unknown unknowns in the tinderbox of this conflict. 

Investors must keep alert and pay more attention to what is going on in Ukraine. There are plenty of downside risks which are mostly ignored by the market at the moment. And stand by for more Russian foreign-policy announcements on Bloomberg.

Ukraine map
 Tinderbox region. Image: Shutterstock

— Edited by John Acher

Nadia Kazakova is a specialist on Russia, particularly the oil and gas sector


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on or as a result of the use of the Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail