Video

Kim Cramer Larsson
Areas covered in this webinar by Saxo Bank technical analyst Kim Cramer Larsson include EURUSD, USDJPY, GBPUSD, EURGBP, gold, silver, S&P 500, the Nasdaq, the Dax, the FTSE and the Dow Jones.
Article / 21 February 2013 at 5:08 GMT

FOMC Minutes: Fear of quantitative easing

Blogger / MoreLiver's Daily
Finland

The minutes from the Federal Reserve’s open market committee (FOMC) January meeting suggest that the committee is preparing itself and the markets to decrease asset purchases. A majority of committee members seem to be happy with quantitative easing as it has helped to keep inflation up near its long-run goal of two percent, growth is moderate and housing markets show signs of life. But there are some dissenting voices. The key outtake is:

However, many participants also expressed some concerns about potential costs and risks arising from further asset purchases. Several participants discussed the possible complications that additional purchases could cause for the eventual withdrawal of policy accommodation, a few mentioned the prospect of inflationary risks, and some noted that further asset purchases could foster market behavior that could undermine financial stability. Several participants noted that a very large portfolio of long-duration assets would, under certain circumstances, expose the Federal Reserve to significant capital losses when these holdings were unwound, but others pointed to offsetting factors and one noted that losses would not impede the effective operation of monetary policy. A few also raised concerns about the potential effects of further asset purchases on the functioning of particular financial markets, although a couple of other participants noted that there had been little evidence to date of such effects. In light of this discussion, the staff was asked for additional analysis ahead of future meetings to support the Committee's ongoing assessment of the asset purchase program.

This means that the next FOMC meeting in Mar-19-20 will be highly interesting, and the official’s statements and speeches will be combed thoroughly before that date. As I wrote after the meeting on Jan-31:

Approaching the destination will at least force the Fed to reveal its plan for landing the QE-plane. The fuel (balance sheet toleration) is running out, the destination is approaching (unemployment level) and the crew is getting restless (growing dissent, end of Bernanke’s term). The Fed will have to land soon, so fasten your seatbelts.

Still more from the FOMC minutes:

Several participants emphasized that the Committee should be prepared to vary the pace of asset purchases, either in response to changes in the economic outlook or as its evaluation of the efficacy and costs of such purchases evolved. For example, one participant argued that purchases should vary incrementally from meeting to meeting in response to incoming information about the economy. A number of participants stated that an ongoing evaluation of the efficacy, costs, and risks of asset purchases might well lead the Committee to taper or end its purchases before it judged that a substantial improvement in the outlook for the labor market had occurred. Several others argued that the potential costs of reducing or ending asset purchases too soon were also significant, or that asset purchases should continue until a substantial improvement in the labor market outlook had occurred. A few participants noted examples of past instances in which policymakers had prematurely removed accommodation, with adverse effects on economic growth, employment, and price stability; they also stressed the importance of communicating the Committee's commitment to maintaining a highly accommodative stance of policy as long as warranted by economic conditions. In this regard, a number of participants discussed the possibility of providing monetary accommodation by holding securities for a longer period than envisioned in the Committee's exit principles, either as a supplement to, or a replacement for, asset purchases.

This does not sound like the "open-ended” and threshold-based policy the Fed promised us in December. The FOMC seems to know that the risk-reward ratio of the QE is high – the effectiveness of the program is limited, while the risks arising from the eventual exit grow with every additional purchase. Also remember that the participants know that the minutes will be published – I believe the dissenters were somewhat holding back their criticism and were team players at the end of the day.

On the other hand, during the time of the meeting, Europe seemed to be “solved” – at least on a cash flow basis, as sovereign auctions went well and yields were low, even though balance sheet issues were still largely unsolved. Should Europe take a turn for the worse, the FOMC would surely switch to a more dovish mode.

So what will be the market’s reaction after sleeping on it? I guess most participants already knew that the FOMC has dissenters, and that QE has gone on for perhaps too long for the Fed’s taste. EURUSD is currently sitting at levels where I would rather be a short-term buyer: a move lower would in my opinion reverse the EURUSD’s bull trend (earlier squawk on technicals). After the current levels, the next support area is 1.3280-1.3230. The pair has been very choppy due to the GBP and JPY largely driving the show. Instead of using predetermined levels, I would watch overbought/oversold indicators on multiple timeframes and fade breakouts. The month of February has been spent in a zigzagging falling pattern, which could be interpreted as a flag formation within the long-term uptrend. But no longs before an hourly base.

 EURUSD post-FOMC minutes

The minutes on Federal Reserve’s website

Previously from me:

Jan FOMC Aftermath: No changes, weather blamed

Jan FOMC Preview

Dec FOMC Afterthoughts: Priced in, to be continued?

Dec FOMC Preview: New monthly purchases likely after Operation Twist

 

6y
Juhani Huopainen Juhani Huopainen
Please note the typo: the support area mentioned in the text should be 1.3180-1.3130, as the attached chart shows. Sorry.

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Tradingfloor.com permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Tradingfloor.com and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Tradingfloor.com is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Tradingfloor.com or as a result of the use of the Tradingfloor.com. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through Tradingfloor.com your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. Tradingfloor.com does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail