Kim Cramer Larsson
Areas covered in this webinar by Saxo Bank technical analyst Kim Cramer Larsson include EURUSD, USDJPY, GBPUSD, EURGBP, gold, silver, S&P 500, the Nasdaq, the Dax, the FTSE and the Dow Jones.
Article / 02 May 2013 at 16:24 GMT

ECB afterthoughts: Rate cuts but nothing more

Blogger / MoreLiver's Daily

Rates cut as expected

The much-anticipated European Central Bank’s meeting and the following press conference went without bigger surprises. The refinancing rate was decreased by 25 basis points to 0.50 percent, the marginal lending facility rate decreased by 50 basis points to 1 percent and the deposit facility rate unchanged at 0.00 percent (ECB). This was in line with expectations. The refinance rate cut has little effect on where it is needed, and should be seen more as signalinig at this point. The marginal lending facility rate has almost no effect at all as the amounts that are loaned through that channel are very small – though the aggressive cut can be interpreted as more signalling. See also the introductory statement and the previous statement from the April 4 meeting.

So what could the ECB be signalling? Mario Draghi threw the ball very forcefully back to Brussels and elected officials by calling for the banking union, continued fiscal balancing (not too much of austerity, but not too little, either) and bank recapitalisation. Draghi said that the ECB has a task force with the European Investment Bank on asset-backed securities or ABS. The real problem in Europe is not the high central bank rates, but high bank lending rates and low credit demand. The low interest rates of the ECB are not transmitting to the crisis countries and even in countries like Finland, the industry heads have recently been complaining about the high cost of credit. More thoughts on this at the end of this article.

Negative deposit rates – probably not

The deposit rate was left at zero and as the banking system has plenty of liquidity, this is the rate that is currently constraining lending. The banks prefer to have excess liquidity and park it at the central bank. During the press conference,  Draghi said that technically the bank was prepared to cut the rate to negative territory, but also acknowledged that such an unprecedented move would have unwanted effects. It does not look probable that the ECB would actually go that way, but they kept the option open, nevertheless. See also Steen Jakobsen’s squawk.


In short, the ECB’s toolbox is currently almost empty, but it tries to scare the markets with talk on negative rates and ABS programmes. By repeating the acronyms LTRO and OMT at every press conference, Draghi establishes an “ECB put option” – this avoids disaster and tail risks, but does very little to help the real economy. The European leaders should soon decide if they will allow the ECB to perform like the other central banks are doing, but unfortunately such a decision will have to wait until someone either leaves the Euro club, or Germany’s elections are over. As I have said many times, Angela Merkel’s re-election campaign is the most expensive one in history.

Market Reaction

EURUSD dropped, then went up after the interest rate announcement. It looks like we are back to range trading after a superficially convincing upside move, which would imply that there is more downside left.

 eurusd post ecb press

ecb day reactions  

More on the topic: loan packaging as a solution  

The whole credit crisis started when the business of structuring and packaging of loans went from euphoria to catatonia. Both the demand and supply of asset-backed securities (ABS) died and has remained dead, just like Draghi stated during the press conference. This is one area where the ECB could be of assistance, by finding ways to help the packagers and investors to return to the game. There are plenty of ways, like easier collateral requirements, guarantees and smaller haircuts. While no one wants a return to the packaging madness seen before the crisis, the current situation, in which investors are hungry for yield and SMEs are not getting loans at acceptable rates, is not satisfactory either.

ABS-programmes are no panacea

The problem is such measures take time to design properly. Every country has its own issues, just like every sector has. The ECB does not want to pump up a sector and just recreate problems that have existed before. Supporting liquidity needs of banks and sovereigns is much easier than navigating the sea of corporate lending. Who rates the product? Who carries the risk? Will the added risk to the ECB actually provide the results that are wanted?

The ECB’s support for the ABS-market could be seen as a way to do quantitative easing within the central bank’s mandate. The Federal Reserve first started doing quantitative easing with government bonds, and later moved to ABS by starting purchases of mortgage loans. If the European ABS-programme would include mark-to-market policies and the risk would wholly belong to the banks, it would not be pure QE and debt mutualisation, although the ECB’s risks would increase slightly, in case the bank and/or the bank’s host country got intro trouble.

If the programme would take even more risk to the ECB (i.e. ECB buys them), it would constitute risk sharing and probable loss generation to the creditor countries. This would easily be perceived as a risk and wealth transfer, as well as face strong political resistance. Things would have to get lot worse before Germany would allow something like that to happen. See also Steen Jakobsen’s post related to SME lending.



The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on or as a result of the use of the Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail