John J Hardy
In this latest webinar, Saxo Bank's head of FX strategy John Hardy analyses the market after the central bank of Turkey announced a huge rate hike.
Article / 18 March 2013 at 6:53 GMT

Cyprus Bailout - the final kick of the can?

Blogger / MoreLiver's Daily

An interesting compromise on Cyprus: a EUR 5 billion bail-in by a small haircut on deposits, with bank stocks offered in return to the depositors and a EUR 10 billion bailout from the EU, coupled with the usual austerity requirements.

By acting after the Italian elections, options were limited
The option of conducting a bail-in (confiscating deposits) was tabled months ago and leaked. The deposit flight from Cyprus was measured in billions because of that. Guess if the leak will ever be investigated? The European Union had painted itself in the corner: not wanting to deal with Cyprus immediately has proven costly. The EU had hoped for a pro-euro, pro-austerity government in Italy, but the plan backfired. The idea was that by postponing the bailout it would help in the elections.

It was impossible to wait until the German elections, as Cyprus has a bond maturity in June that it would have been unable to pay. As the maturity date was so close, there was no time to take the bond owners to court (the bonds were issued under English law, so a simple haircut was not possible). The only way to fund the bailout was either a gift from the EU or deposit confiscation. They did both.

Russia obviously made some thinly veiled threats that they would only accept a deposit haircut of below 10 percent, so in order to rake in enough money from the deposits, the EU had to go for the little people’s accounts as well – thus breaking their word on the guaranteed deposits below EUR 100,000. Even with that, the EU has to fork over EUR 10 bn as the confiscation will bring in only EUR 5 bn.

Warming up for a bank jog?
Personally I believe a simple gift of EUR 5 bn of free money would have been a better choice. The lending of EUR 10 bn raises the debt/GDP, lowers growth prospects, forces austerity and has the danger of creating a negative spiral that could turn the island into a second Greece: a continuous source of headaches and disappointment to the EU. The haircut is small and while commissioner Rehn stated that this is a one-off and Cyprus is a special case, whether the depositors in Spain and Italy believe this remains to be seen. If not, the bank jogs slow bank runs could start again. That could push Spain to eventually apply for the ECB's OMT-program. Perhaps that is what Brussels and the ECB actually want. But with the IMF and Germany coming to the negotiations demanding a 40 percent deposit cut, ‘more Europe’ is no longer a winning campaign promise.

Further apart or closer still?
There are two ways of seeing this: #1 Europe just became even more dysfunctional and fragmented, or #2 it has become more unified in doing whatever it takes to protect investors’ interests:

#1 Europe has violated the sanctity of private property, the guaranteed deposit limit of EUR 100,000, democratic decision-making, innocent people end up paying for other’s mistakes by coercion, depositors in crisis countries will move their funds to countries deemed safe, igniting the crisis. The deposit haircut will not remain an isolated case, and investors cannot trust the ECB, Brussels or Germany any more. National governments are at the mercy of the Troika, and the ECB is not the glue that holds the union together, but a weapon of financial mass destruction that forces any opponents to comply. Cyprus is not a special, isolated case. Conclusions: Bank runs and panic. Sell EUR, sell crisis country bonds, buy safe assets preferably outside the euro area.

#2 Decision-makers have finally found a way to impose austerity on non-compliant member nations over the democratic multilateral process. The electorate is finally forced to accept its responsibility to vote for sane and proper leaders and to monitor their performance. While deposit cuts and other measures seem unfair, they are easy to implement and difficult to avoid – the only way to avoid is a bankrun, which would bring any government to its knees. By their actions, the Germans, the IMF and the ECB have shown that they mean business. Incentives for governments to freeride on the euro and pretend fiscal austerity and labor market reforms have greatly diminished. The idea of leaving the euro or partial bond defaults is suddenly less popular, as it is known that the ECB will destroy and nation stepping out of line. Government- and bank bond owners have been protected through fiscal repression, protecting investors. Cyprus is a special, unique case. Conclusions: Euro area breakup-risk minimal, exit-talk and resistance to austerity decreased. Defaults ruled out. Buy crisis country bonds and stocks in the euro area, avoid bank deposits in crisis countries.


Personally, I’d vote for #1. The commentary is already utterly negative, but it might take some time for the markets to realize that the upside in crisis country bonds is minimal and there are no restrictions stopping the bank jogs. Next week in Europe will be very, very interesting.


Sunday funnies:
On Friday morning the IMF posted a large report on Europe where they stated that the deposit guarantee scheme in the euro area must be ironclad. On Friday evening they happily agreed to go against their own advice.

Cyprus has agreed to an outside audit of its banking sector, but Nicos Anastasiades, the president, says it will “never” accept a haircut of depositors – Financial Times, March 14, 2013


Opinions from blogs:

Cyprus bailout a major game changerTradingFloor
This is a breach of fundamental property rights, dictated to a small country by foreign powers and it must make every bank depositor in Europe shiver.

Why today's Cyprus bailout could be the start of the next financial crisisWonkblog / WP
European officials have spent the past six years moving heaven and earth to ensure that no depositors with the continent's banks suffer a loss despite the financial strains the banks have been under… So is Cyprus different?

A stupid idea whose time had comealphaville / FT
A “one-off” is often anything but. Calling something after “stability” is not very stable. Saying that something is not a precedent usually makes it one.

The Meaning of CyprusMarc to Market
One general principle that the EU continues to pursue is tightening the linkage between solvency and sovereignty.  This is vital and the basis upon which a more integrated Europe will be built.    To the extent one becomes less solvent, one must surrender greater sovereignty.  Cyprus was insolvent.  A large swath of its sovereignty has been ceded to the EU. 

The Cyprus Conspiracy IIMacro Man
The clear conclusions to us are that the Troika have gone too far, and Eurozone deposit insurance is now worthless. The Troika have let the cat out of the bag, and we do not think it likely that this will eventually be implemented as it is likely to result in protests, serious rioting, and possible assassinations (given the alleged involvement of the Russian mafia). The market reaction to this is likely to be rather bad.

The Cyprus precedentFelix Salmon / Reuters
The big winner here is the ECB, which has extended a lot of credit to dubiously-solvent Cypriot banks and which is taking no losses at all. And although they might wake up bruised, the big Russian depositors are probably winners too, given that they risked losing everything and will end up losing just 10 percent. Finally, of course, there are all the hedge funds who have been betting that the Cypriot government won’t default: they’re all popping Champagne right now.

Is Euro-geddon Nigh?Twenty-Cent Paradigms
One of the most basic lessons from the 1930's, as well as the semi-regular banking panics of the 19th century, is the importance of preventing bank runs. 

A muddled and dangerous approach to CyprusThe A-list / FT
Mohamed El-Erian: European officials were right to look for a bold approach for Cyprus. But in compromising excessively on critical design elements, they risk ending up in the disruptive muddled middle: not going far enough to solve the country’s problems, and not being sufficiently careful in containing potential negative externalities.

Cyprus Bailout: What Happened to Absolute Priority?Credit Slips
The problem isn't that Cypriot depositors have to make a co-pay, but that the co-pay costs are not being divvied up among Cypriot depositors and the other creditors and equityholders of Cypriot banks either per absolute priority or rateably.

Sowing the windCoppola Comment
For the fact is that deposit insurance everywhere in the EU has now been undermined. The precedent has been set for insured depositors to suffer losses in order to protect Russian oligarchs and reckless banks. If the Eurogroup can impose this on Cyprus, it can do so elsewhere too.

Deposit insurance, bank runs, international currencies, and the inflation taxWorthwhile
If the banking sector is too big, and if bank losses are too big, relative to the country's ability to pay, deposit insurance as a way to prevent bank runs is not credible and won't work in a country that cannot print.

What will savers do?Buttonwood’s / The Economist
Early in the crisis, a wise ex-colleague wrote to say that "Savers will pay for the mess. They are the only ones that have any money left."

Cyprus bails-in depositors to reduce cost of Eurozone bailout - a turning point in the Eurozone crisis?Open Europe




The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on or as a result of the use of the Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail