Ole Hansen
Ole Hansen, Saxo Bank’s head of commodity strategy, takes a closer look at the oil market amid new US sanctions on Iran and Opec members increasing barrel production.
Article / 21 December 2012 at 11:38 GMT

Commodity indices and the January rebalancing

Head of Commodity Strategy / Saxo Bank

Investors in commodities have experienced another difficult year in 2012, as performance in the three main sectors - metals, energy and agriculture - have varied greatly. In the following overview, we take a look at the most popular ways of tracking commodity performance and the potential impact, if any, of the January rebalancing. 

Taking a look at the sector performance of two of the world’s most followed commodity indices - the Dow Jones UBS CI index and the S&P GSCI index – reveals that overall return so far this year is just around zero. This is a weak performance if we compare it with the 14 percent return on the S&P Index or the 14.5 percent return on the MSCI World index during the same time.

 2012 Sector Performances  

What is a commodity index?
Before moving on, let us just have a look at what a commodity index actually is and how it works. A commodity index either invests in or tracks the performance of a group of commodities based on predefined rules. It is often the performance of these indices that is referred to in the media or when comparing commodity performance with other markets, such as stocks and bonds. Large investors often prefer a diversified approach, especially to commodities, given the high level of volatility that invariably goes with investing in individual commodities. Commodity index funds help investors to properly benchmark the performance and return of their investments. Due to the increased popularity of commodities these funds have grown in recent years. 

Two major indices
The two major indices, as mentioned above - the S&P GSCI index and the DJ-UBSCI index - have become the industry-standard benchmarks for investors in commodities. These two indices have a large investor following, with billions of dollars having been invested either directly into the funds or through exchange traded funds, which track their performance. Furthermore, many local commodity fund offerings track one of the two commodity funds. 

Different structure and strategy
The S&P GSCI, established in 1991, is an index calculated primarily on a world production weighted basis and it comprises 24 physical commodities that are the subject of active, liquid futures markets. The weight of each commodity in this index is determined by the average quantity of production and is designed to reflect the relative significance of each of the included commodities in the world economy. Due to this structure the S&P GSCI is very heavily exposed towards the energy sector, with 70 percent of the index currently invested in products ranging from crude oil to natural gas.

 Index structures

The DJ-UBSCI, established in 1998, has a more diversified approach. This index comprises 22 physical commodities, all represented by an active futures market.  No single commodity can comprise less than 2 percent or more than 15 percent of the index and no group or sector can represent more than 33 percent of the index. The weightings for each commodity included are calculated in accordance with rules designed to ensure that the relative proportion of each of the underlying individual commodities reflects its global economic significance and market liquidity. 

Different composition - different performance
The different structure of the two indices helps to explain their different performances, as seen below. The energy sector, for example, has had the greatest impact on the performance of the GSCI index. This was particularly clear during the first half of 2012, when geo-political concerns related to Iran’s nuclear intentions sent oil higher before collapsing by 30 percent. From June and into August the main focus was on the key crops, such as corn, wheat and soybeans, as drought hit large areas of the US, Russia and Ukraine. This helped the DJ-UBS to outperform given its higher allocation to grains and into Q4 this outperformance continued as industrial metals became the main focus. 

Investors looking for passively managed exposure should therefore be aware of these differences. One could either go for a primary exposure to energy through the S&P GSCI or the more broad based approach being offered by the DJ UBS index. There are of course numerous other commodity indices which also can be traded through Exchange Traded Funds, of which the best known are probably the Reuters-Jeffries CRB Index and the Rogers International Commodity index.

Year to date developments  

Impacts of the January rebalancing
Index-linked commodity investments such as the ones that follow the major commodity indices mentioned go through a rebalancing period every year where the index weightings are adjusted. The reason for this process is to align and adjust existing positions according to the individual performances during the previous year. Generally, the exercise involves buying/increasing the exposure of commodities which suffered losses during the previous year at the expense of selling/reducing commodities experiencing gains. In addition, the overall target weight of an individual commodity or sector can also be adjusted, while old contracts can be removed or new added. The rebalancing for both commodity indices occurs in January during a five-day business period from January 8 to January 14. 

DJ-UBS will next year include soybean meal and KCBT wheat which in both cases will result in some selling of CBOT wheat and soybeans in order to make room for the new entrants, while at the same time maintaining an unchanged exposure to the grains and oilseeds sector. The biggest change, however, is the decision by S&P GSCI to further increase the exposure to Brent Crude Oil at the expense of WTI Crude Oil as it continues to lose importance on the global energy scene. Although WTI still carries the highest weight, it will nevertheless see a 6.25 percent reduction to 24.71 percent, while Brent will get a 3.99 percent increase to 22.34 percent.

 Impact of January rebalancing  

It is estimated that between USD 80 and 100 billion is invested in products tracking the S&P GSCI and the change in the two oil weightings could, according to ETF Securities, result in a USD 4.5 billion move out of WTI and USD 5 billion move into Brent. Although these are big numbers, they both represent less than two percent of the total average daily trading volumes and as such should be easily digested by the market. Another reason for expecting no major impact is the fact that these changes have been announced well in advance and while they could make a short-term impact on time spreads no permanent impact on spot prices should be seen as these transactions do not create any additional physical supply/demand.

Iva Iva
Hi Ole, thank you very much for your support in 2012, Merry Christmas and happy New Year 2013!
Ole Hansen Ole Hansen
Thank you Iva. The same wishes goes to you and all our readers.


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on or as a result of the use of the Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail