China's trade data posted overnight showed scant evidence of the Sino-US trade war with exports steady and imports on the rise. It is likely too early for the US tariffs to skew the data much yet, however, and another drop in Chinese equities shows that the situation is far from resolved.
Article / 09 October 2015 at 2:55 GMT

China gives Didi the green light, Uber a honk

China Watcher / Shanghai
  • Didi-Kuaidi can run private taxi drivers - serious competition for Uber
  • Uber appears to be trying to be compliant with local regulations
  • The license for private drivers is a major blow for China’s licensed taxi industry

By Neil Flynn

The large domestic taxi-hailing app Didi Kuaidi has announced that it has received a license from the Shanghai Municipal Transportation Commission (SMTC) to run private taxi drivers legally.

This represents major progress in China because the legality of private taxi drivers has been thrust to the forefront since the explosive growth of Didi-Kuaidi and Uber. The issue over private drivers using the platform has been a major grey areas for firms and regulators, who are happy to encourage the technological development in the industry, but don’t want to encourage the unlicensed taxi business.

The new license would require mandatory insurance, third party liability insurance, carrier’s liability insurance and passenger insurance. The firm would also launch improved customer service channels in order to make sure that passengers are protected.

Over the past 12 months, Didi-Kuaidi has developed from two individual rival platforms that were specifically for licensed taxi drivers into a merged all-encompassing transport network, which allows users to find licensed taxi drivers, private drivers and carpooling.

While the licensed taxi driver business was never an issue, the government has been making a lot of noise about private taxi drivers. Uber has been the major target of this, given that the firm solely focuses on private drivers (and is foreign), and has seen its offices raided multiple times.

There's no need to pay the high tips for a licensed taxi when you can find
a private driver to do the journey for half the price. Photo: iStock

To put this issue into context, prior to Didi-Kuaidi, it would be (and still is) common to see private taxi drivers trying to hanging around airports and stations trying to undercut licensed taxi drivers on price, and taxi-hailing apps have essentially digitised this.

The price is calculated through the app, so the risk of been conned is decreased, yet whilst it may be convenient for passengers, the risk of getting into a car with an unlicensed taxi driver remains.

The license for private drivers would act as a major blow for China’s licensed taxi industry, because just like with other countries that have seen taxi drivers protesting against Uber, the private driver license would severely affect the licensed taxi industry.

A major difference is that in China, taxis are very cheap, and even here in Shanghai, a journey that would cost £40 in London would cost RMB25 in Shanghai. The problem is that taxis have become much more difficult to hail since the launch of the original Didi and Kuaidi apps, because during busy times it is almost essential to add a significant tip for the driver in order to them to take the fare.

The expansion into private taxi drivers has vastly increased the supply of taxis, so it becomes unnecessary to pay the high tips for a licensed taxi when you can find a private driver to do the journey for half the price.

Uber is accommodating regulator’s demands

On the same day was Didi-Kuaidi’s announcement, Uber disclosed that it is transferring all of its China business onto local servers, as well as plans to invest RMB6.3bn in China over the coming years.

This is a clear sign from the US firm that it is doing everything it can to get Chinese regulators to treat it like its domestic rivals. The largest concern that regulators have that specifically relates to Uber is that it is a foreign firm, and has since been treated differently to domestic rivals.

Regulators are uncomfortable with payment data being sent to overseas servers, which is a common theme across emerging markets. I have previously discussed India’s reluctance towards Chinese smartphone manufacturer Xiaomi, as its data is sent to servers in Beijing.

Uber has set up a Chinese subsidiary called Shanghai Wubo Information Technology Company in Shanghai’s Free Trade Zone. For those somewhat familiar with Shanghai, the free trade zone was originally an area in the outskirts of the city next to the international airport, but has since expanded to include the Lujiazui financial district in Pudong.  

Upon the announcement of Didi-Kuaidi’s license, Uber is said to be actively preparing the relevant documents and materials in order to attain the same license. While I don’t believe that it will be next to receive the license, given that other domestic firms such as Shenzhou Taxi and Kuaidi One will be actively applying for it, Uber has shown that it is willing to do all it can to rectify domestic regulator’s problems.

The new license will officially see the private taxi industry become legitimised, and I believe that it is only a matter of time before Uber receives this license.

-- Edited by Adam Courtenay

Neil Flynn is a China watcher based in Shanghai. Follow Neil or post your comment below to engage with Saxo Bank's social trading platform.


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on or as a result of the use of the Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail