Video

#SaxoStrats
Political anxiety in Europe continues unabated Monday morning as the spread between Dutch 10-year bonds yields and their German counterpart stretches out to 34 basis points ahead of next month's pivotal election.
Article / 19 September 2012 at 4:55 GMT

China Finance: Worried about stock fraud? Look at the auditors

Founder / ChinaRAI
China

Chinese stock auditing My TradingFloor.com colleague Matt Bolduc recently wrote an excellent article about how to avoid fradulent companies when picking Chinese small-cap firms.  Matt is right: one of the major concerns facing any investor in Chinese equities is the question of accounting. Can you trust the numbers you are given in the financial reports?

In general the market is taking a rather dim view when it comes to this topic, as witnessed by over 200 Chinese equities currently trading at a P/B under 1 according to Saxo Bank's stock screener. This is legitimised by the long and sad list of financial irregularities and fraud by companies which have their major assets or earnings in China. But if we’re comparing track records, we should go into more detail than simply stating there have been a lot of accounting issues.

In order to get some feel for the track record of accounting firms in China, I started out with a list compiled by the Pittsburgh Tribune earlier this year detailing Chinese companies that have run into trouble in the US. I added on some later breaking stories like Qihoo 360 Technology (NASDAQ: QIHU for example) and some cases from Canada and Hong Kong. While this list isn't exhaustive, it cotains over 100 individual cases that taken together provide at least a good starting point for assessing an auditor track record.

In general, we can say that you would be better off buying stock in a Chinese company that has been audited by a Big 4 accounting firm (KPMG, Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young, PricewaterhouseCoopers) than one that has had its books checked by a smaller accounting firm. This is no surprise: the Big 4 handle China's huge state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and most Chinese IPOs, so there’s some natural selection favouring them.

However, just five auditors have been involved in auditing a full 30% of our troubled Chinese companies. They include two Big 4 firms: Deloitte and E&Y.

5 firms accounted for 30% of the sample

Deloitte has already had some SEC trouble with its China-based accounting business, as well as plenty of negative media coverage, and the percentage above is not flattering, either. The discrepancy becomes even clearer when we examine D&Ts auditing presence at the troubled firms on our list compared to their Big 4 rivals. 

Deloitte had the lions share of instances among the big 4

China, clearly, has been a headache for the otherwise respected firm of Deloitte & Touche. 

Even so, your overall best bet to avoid fraud when choosing a Chinese equity investment seems to be to stick to companies that have been audited by a Big 4 firm. Companies audited by PWC, in particular, have fared very well in my initial group of over 100 companies.

But among the smaller companies trading below market-to-book, you’re unlikely to find any Big 4 audits. In this instance, you can have a look at the table I have provided at the end of this piece to act as some sort of guide. It’s not exhaustive, but it has enough data to at least be somewhat relevant as a way to check the track record of the auditor in question.

Do please note however that I have not differentiated between the seriousness of the issues involved, so as far as these numbers are concerned, an auditor resignation from a small-cap counts exactly the same as what happened at Sino-Forest.

Most of the companies were structured as RTOs (Reverse Take-Overs, a type of merger used by private companies to become publicly traded without an IPO) but a few companies with legitimate IPOs also made the cut, so an IPO in itself is no guarantee of safety. However, only 15% of the companies in my sample had gone through a proper IPO, so if you're looking for some reassurance it definitely doesn't hurt.

In a climate where equity prices are so vunerable to rumours and potential short seller attacks, checking the track record of your auditor is important, if for no other reason than that it’s a favourite red flag among many short sellers.

Auditing troubled Chinese companies: List of accounting firms

Others category consists of companies with only one occurance.


-----------

I write regularly about Chinese equities, mainly those listed on foreign exchanges. If you'd like to comment on this story or be notified by email whenever a new China Finance story is published, become a member - it's free, and you can use your Twitter, Facebook, Google or LinkedIn login - and "follow" the China Finance blog during the signup process. You can also bookmark the China Finance blog page

Relevant articles for you

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Tradingfloor.com permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Tradingfloor.com and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Tradingfloor.com is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Tradingfloor.com or as a result of the use of the Tradingfloor.com. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. When trading through Tradingfloor.com your contracting Saxo Bank Group entity will be the counterparty to any trading entered into by you. Tradingfloor.com does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of ourtrading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws. Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Invetment Research
- Full disclaimer

Check your inbox for a mail from us to fully activate your profile. No mail? Have us re-send your verification mail